The big pro of the Southern Baptist missions program (the Cooperative Program) is efficiency. More or less, once a missionary has cleared the vetting process, he or she is funded and sent to the field—no deputation! The big con is that the distance between the missionaries and local churches can be much greater, putting accountability in the hands of the Convention than the local churches. (Of course, these pros and cons barely scratch the surface of whether the Cooperative Program model is consistent with the NT model.)
Regardless, now Tom Ascol is asking some great questions about the presumed efficiency of the Cooperative Program approach. I'm particularly interested in his observations about younger generations of SBC pastors. I hope he's right.
3 comments:
It's always been interesting to me that there are 10,000 independent Baptist churches and 40,000 SBC churches, but the cumulative total of missionaries represented in independent fundamental mission boards have more missionaries than the whole SBC.
I would be very interested to see the documentation for those statistics. I think the SBC numbers are pretty accessible, but how did you calculate the IFB numbers?
You can access the World Mission Handbook published now by the Billy Graham Center. However, the BBF published an article about this a couple of years ago. The numbers on giving would also prove the ineffectiveness of the SBC program vs. a local-church-based missions program.
I don't like quoting this source, but I couldn't find the original BBF article. Here is the article - http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/independentmissionaries.htm
Post a Comment