They are afraid of real gospel Calvinism.Amid all the talk among contemporary Southern Baptists and independent fundamentalists that the doctrines of grace are not a matter that demand division, I find myself wondering what Spurgeon would say were he around to see the things that masquerade as the gospel these days.
Now, of course, what Spurgeon would do doesn't make a thing right. But neither do contrary arguments from SBC and IFB history. What makes a thing right is ultimately whether that thing conforms to Scripture. How man-centered or repentance-bankrupt can a gospel be before it ceases to be the gospel? And how much cooperation or fellowship can take place when there's disagreement over the gospel? Perhaps that is a question the churches of this generation will need to determine.
5 comments:
I dunno, ask John Wesley.
Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3
"gospel Calvinism"? Give me a break.
ol' "anonymous" is a tough act to follow! He's all over the blogosphere, too, with such brilliant commentary.
Nevertheless, "How man-centered or repentance-bankrupt can a gospel be before it ceases to be the gospel? "--that's the question! John Wesley never showed any signs of being man-centered or repentence bankrupt. This isn't really a question of calvinist vs arminian, but a question of God's Way vs man's way.
i have to agree with anonymous: what is "gospel Calvinism"?
this has nothing to do with the post...
BEN! I missed you! :(
Post a Comment